Sunday, July 3, 2011

New Jennifer Aniston With Bangs

images Jennifer Aniston channeled her New Jennifer Aniston With Bangs. jennifer aniston bangs.
  • jennifer aniston bangs.


  • bheemi
    06-21 02:04 PM
    I would request as whole us know that CIR will not comeup this yeat..I would request if there is any plan IV is mkaing in this regard. I dont think waiting until end of July and then proceed for new bill is good way...

    I would request to look for some alternatives from now itself..atleast filing 485 under retrogression and 3 year ead/ap..

    any thoughts about this?




    wallpaper jennifer aniston bangs. New Jennifer Aniston With Bangs. Justin Bieber#39;s angs: God#39;s
  • Justin Bieber#39;s angs: God#39;s


  • ssa
    06-22 04:59 PM
    My labour and I-140 is approved last year and I am working with current employer from last 1 and half years. Employer is making good money trough me....
    m very much in tension and he is talking to me.

    Can someone suggest what may be the option for me?

    Its all about how you negotiate. You may have some leeway in your negotiations if you have enough years left on your H1B. If all other peaceful negotiations fail let them know - without loosing your temper - that filing I 485 is the most important thing for you at this point and if it does not get done before the PDs retrogress again you will look out for other job using H1B transfer. All they worry about is the billing money they get out of you and they are worried once you file I-485 they will loose it in 6 months due to AC21. If you make them see that they will loose it other way too they may cut some deal with you.
    Just my 2 cents




    New Jennifer Aniston With Bangs. jennifer aniston bangs
  • jennifer aniston bangs


  • rc0878
    08-27 02:31 PM
    Filed I485/EAD/AP on July 19th @ NSC. Checks not cashed yet...No receipt#




    2011 Justin Bieber#39;s angs: God#39;s New Jennifer Aniston With Bangs. Look 4: Jennifer Aniston#39;s new
  • Look 4: Jennifer Aniston#39;s new


  • subdhar
    08-23 12:06 PM
    Looks like there are no approvals from TSC .....from last two weeks..



    more...

    New Jennifer Aniston With Bangs. new jennifer aniston with
  • new jennifer aniston with


  • number30
    05-04 09:30 PM
    Hello Sir,

    While opinions are good and welcome. My requirement is to see the exact INA language.

    I have read the INA Sec 203 multiple times, I could not find the link between ebquota and ebdependents. May be I am missing it. Can some one show the exact lines in INA ?

    Think about this "5 year old derivative kid" is counted in ebquota. How did the kid qualify for ebquota ? The law clearly says "to qualified immigrants who are aliens described in any of the following subparagraphs" and then goes on to say the exact qualification.

    Don't take me out of context. I do want the kid to get greencard, however I am against the kid being counted in ebquota.

    I am yet to get the access to ( I am a recent donor ) donor thread that refers the exact INA language. Can some other donor post the exact INA language in this thread ?

    Thanks

    I spoke with our attorney
    He said
    INA Sec 203 talks only about the eligibility to apply the I-485. But the visa number is derived from a relationship to Principal applicant of green card. This is true for all categories Including investor, asylum, Employment categories. Please note that It is Dept of State that is responsible for this allocation not USCIS.




    New Jennifer Aniston With Bangs. jennifer aniston new
  • jennifer aniston new


  • gc_on_demand
    05-01 02:13 PM
    Not sure I understand your scenario.

    Why would the dependent not file AOS at all ? Are you refering to CP ?

    My good faith best understanding is FB2 is not far behind. please refer VB.

    There may be a chance that Eb2 india will touch 2008 in a year. and F2b will be at 2006. How dependet can file 485 as if they counted against F2A their date is not current.



    more...

    New Jennifer Aniston With Bangs. jennifer aniston bangs.
  • jennifer aniston bangs.


  • dilbert_cal
    06-05 11:08 AM
    The question is: Is he milking you or your your company? LOL and UDD.

    UDD for use due diligence.

    Not everyone is filing 485 only. Some folks are filing 140 and 485 and in that case, technically, there is one part which has Premium Processing.




    2010 jennifer aniston bangs New Jennifer Aniston With Bangs. Jennifer Aniston channeled her
  • Jennifer Aniston channeled her


  • nixstor
    07-07 10:26 PM
    I think we should go to USCIS/DOS office. But problem is we have to do this on weekdays and most of member won't be join on weekdays because of work.
    If we do on weekend then we will get more response but then offices will be closed unless they working on weekend as they did last weekend.

    Are you serious? If people are so much interested in getting a GC and would like to make an impact, a day's work should not be a big deal. Forget the weekend stuff as DC streets have no federal government business on weekends. There are some guys who are willing to drive from NY/NJ/NC.

    Even if we take the poll and lets say 500 people would like to come, that number will become 250 or less as most of us will have last minute issues as usual :p



    more...

    New Jennifer Aniston With Bangs. new jennifer aniston with angs.
  • new jennifer aniston with angs.


  • Aah_GC
    05-08 02:33 PM
    lets get together and do something please.. we need to act this month..




    hair Look 4: Jennifer Aniston#39;s new New Jennifer Aniston With Bangs. makeup Jennifer Aniston
  • makeup Jennifer Aniston


  • tonyHK12
    02-17 11:24 AM
    What is the difference between the two? IMO, two words "Effective Marketing". Come on, where are the MBA's among us who can offer strategy? Actually I feel we are so backward that we don't even need MBA's to improve from here, just any simple ideas

    I respectfully disagree. It has nothing to do with marketing, fraud desi companies put up free ads on sulekha, its the mindset of a large number of our audience we are missing and need to account for. maybe it has to do with jugaad/kludge - the goal defines the means (loosely).
    Of course many of these expectations cannot be satisfied in a honest non profit.



    more...

    New Jennifer Aniston With Bangs. Jennifer Aniston New Bangs
  • Jennifer Aniston New Bangs


  • drirshad
    08-13 11:12 PM
    Cool calculation ..............

    On aug 9 th, USCIS nebraska center issued a total of 4063 receipt nos for 485, EAD, and APs.
    see the link http://.com/discuss/485eb/20866725/
    From this, if we assume ~4000/day, it ll take 20 working days to clear july 2nd filers (~80,000). My guess is by 31st Aug.




    hot new jennifer aniston with New Jennifer Aniston With Bangs. new jennifer aniston with
  • new jennifer aniston with


  • arumalla
    07-08 04:45 PM
    can some one send me the updated notice page link, so I can post some threads and start linking to that page in all the tech and news forums I know of... so that we can get more awareness of this issue....

    Thanks
    Chandra Arumalla



    more...

    house dresses jennifer aniston new New Jennifer Aniston With Bangs. hair jennifer aniston bangs
  • hair jennifer aniston bangs


  • purgan
    10-25 07:36 PM
    when american's from such third rate schools are not getting jobs, do you seriously think foreigners with their funny accents and relatively poor English communication skills (I'm Indian and can tell you its still a second language to me) can get jobs??

    The market has a way of regulating itself. As someone mentioned above, there were a a lot of H1 space available from 2001-03. But it never got filled because there were simply not enough jobs. Lets not try to set up govenment intervention here....let the free market decide....that is what made this country great.

    btw, NumbersuSA, FAIR and other restrictionist organizations have zero credibility because they oppose even legal immigration.

    That poll....don't impress me much...




    tattoo jennifer aniston new New Jennifer Aniston With Bangs. Jennifer Aniston: The everyday
  • Jennifer Aniston: The everyday


  • Saralayar
    09-04 02:43 PM
    Bump /\/\/\/\



    more...

    pictures jennifer aniston bangs. New Jennifer Aniston With Bangs. Jennifer Aniston New Bangs
  • Jennifer Aniston New Bangs


  • greenguru
    04-29 07:17 PM
    I wish it is true!

    Countdown starts for the next bulliten, 16 days..

    cheers




    dresses new jennifer aniston with New Jennifer Aniston With Bangs. how to french braid angs
  • how to french braid angs


  • ashshef
    09-10 08:25 PM
    I have been a passive reader on these forums for the most part.
    I would just like to express my appreciation for the work that IV does. I totally support the regular donation thing to gain access to one forum. If you don't want to donate, all you are losing is access to one forum. That forum is only for IV loyals who really believe in IV.
    All that's needed is $25 donation to gain access to it. Lobbying in this country needs a lot of money. If you want IV to work for you, then it's the least you could do.
    The regular donation thing also spurs some not-so-active guys like me to donate, when we might forget.
    As for EB3, and people stressing about concenterating on EB3(I), you can't separate out one legal immigration issue from the other....ultimately all these efforts pay off for all of us. The more you divide all these up, the lesser your number is gonna be and the less likely any lawmakers will help you.
    I understand how frustrating it is to wait for so long. I have been working in this country since mid-2000. I lost my H1 at 6 years and had to go on H4 and sit out from work for an year, when IV's push really helped me get my EAD during the July 2007 fiasco. And I am a VLSI Design Engineer who spent the first half of my stay in US as an employee in a big company(AMD), and still couldn't get anywhere with my GC.
    I have seen ample cases reported on the Sep approval thread where people on EB2 have been in this country for 10+ years.
    Most of us have faced issues with GC. And these issues might be different for all of us. But ultimately, we need to work with a common goal. Pointing fingers at each other in this scenario is the worst we could do to help ourselves, let alone help anyone else.
    For those who can put in the time/money to help out IV. Nothing like it. If not, let's atleast appreciate the work people are doing, and let's stick together.



    more...

    makeup new jennifer aniston with angs. New Jennifer Aniston With Bangs. dresses jennifer aniston new
  • dresses jennifer aniston new


  • Sakthisagar
    08-09 10:59 AM
    Why are you not taking EB1 into account where the diff is 9 - 10 years. I came to US on L1 in 2001 Then applied for EB3 in 2004 which was deneied in 2006. Then started in EB2 in 2006. So if you consider, I have been here since 2001 not that I just come in 2006. Like the same way you too move up in your career and then apply for EB2.

    Read this once more...


    That is the TRUTH. But TRUTH sometimes is undigestable and it hurts a lot, and especially people who is having an agenda it hurts a lot! :-)




    girlfriend Jennifer Aniston: The everyday New Jennifer Aniston With Bangs. jennifer aniston new haircut
  • jennifer aniston new haircut


  • WaitingYaar
    06-07 10:28 AM
    AFAIK all 485 filings have to be sent to NSC. Also, does one need to attach the original I-140 approval with I-485 or a copy of it will suffice?




    hairstyles Jennifer Aniston New Bangs New Jennifer Aniston With Bangs. jennifer aniston new haircut
  • jennifer aniston new haircut


  • royus77
    07-08 09:03 PM
    Can we have this event scheduled for major cities in other parts of US? What day are we looking for this rally? (14th July??)

    I can gather 100+ people from Chicago..


    Forget aboit other cities ,Here we are not able to get enough people in DC , which is having a decent community .If you planning to get 100 in chicago , can you make i to DC nbext weekend .




    krishnam70
    06-18 11:23 AM
    Well, if u have made up ur mind just based on some post(s) (which by the way, may or may not be true and even if true, do u know the minute details around that case like country of origin, was H1 overstayed etc...etc...?), then no matter what I or anybody else suggests, u will still counter by showing that ONE little post. Do a google on AP with canadian landing and u will see many successful cases. So, tally between the successes and failures. I can guarantee u that for atleast every 100 successes u may (or may not) see one problematic case. The general mentality is, well, there was one failure case...so, will I be the next to be caught? U will completely forget about the success cases. Even if its a problematic case, its not like the end of the world for them. They are still given a chance to re-enter USA.If everything goes wrong, then big deal, Canada beckons. Again, its my point of view.

    So, my final suggestion to u is...."Its ur call. Do what ur mind says". If I were in ur position, I'd have taken the risk and I have laid out my points of views in my earlier posts. But for u, I'd only say..."Its ur call".

    Folks this is personal experience

    We during the endless wait for the elusive GC decided to have back up plan. So applied for Canadian PR in March 2003. The Mandatory 52 weeks were in progress when I had to move out of the city from where we used to reside. So I completed the formalities of informing the Immigration dept of canada about the change in address. After 48 weeks we received a letter from the Canadian Immigration to proceed for Medical examinations and finger prints> We completed both the formalities and within 2 months received the request to send out passports for Stamping. In June 2004 we completed the formalities of getting the passport stamped. Meanwhile here in the US we had already received LCA approval and filed 140 and received approval for the same also but we were not hopeful of the GC itself.

    In July 2005 we landed in Canada through Detroit. Drove all the way to Toronto. We were keen to complete all the minimum formalities required like setting up a bank account, applying for SIN etc. We stayed a a friends place and completed the formalities next 2-3 days and then drove back to the US.

    Immigration status:
    My H1 had expired( 6 yrs completed) Feb 2005 so moved on to EAD. During the entry back to US they did not ask any questions. They asked when we entered US etc and general questions about work for which we replied. Questions about AOS were not asked as it was pretty apparent we were in AOS. The IO scanned through the entire passport and even saw the immigration stamp by canadian consulate and did not comment on it. I guess the answer to any potential questions would be that you will let go of the Canadian PR in case you get your US GC. As far as I know there is no statute or directive that IO should cancel the existing US GC process in anyway. The choice of choosing your country of permanent residence is yours I do not know/think if IO has any say in that.( I might be wrong may be we were lucky). Long story short.. We entered back to the US. Subsequently we got our GC cards which were collected by another friend who was visiting Canada and brought them back to the US. This year July is the last window of oppurtunity for us to go back to Canada.

    We did spend close to 2500$ for the whole process if I counted right.We filed ourselves. It was a valid back up plan for the position we were in. I have had 2 more colleagues of mine who were in the same situation and applied and got their Canadian PR's in the same way and no issues when entering back to the US. One of them even goes to canada every few months to show he is working out of Canada and goes out on consulting jobs. He is maintaining a virtual phone number in canada for any contacts that gets routed to his US number if somebody calls.

    Any call to go this route is purely personal and one person's experience is not a yardstick to say that is the norm.

    - cheera




    sankap
    07-10 12:45 AM
    @desi3933:
    This comment was then obviously was not directed to you but to others who advise to "file AC21." Please show me any of my post where I have advised people to file for AC-21.


    .



    No comments:

    Post a Comment